case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2021-05-21 03:11 pm

[ SECRET POST #5250 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5250 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________


03.



__________________________________________________


04.
[Lux-Pain]


__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________


06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________
















08. [WARNING for discussion of underage ships]

[Jujutsu Kaisen]


__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for discussion of gore, rape]

[Evenicle]


__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for discussion of sexual harassment]














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #751.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2021-05-22 05:50 pm (UTC)(link)
So your theory is that not blacklisting women who speak out about sexual harassment, which literally means hiring women who have been sexually abused at work and have spoken out about it, is somehow different from hiring women who have survived sexual abuse?