[ SECRET POST #5255 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5255 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________


03.



__________________________________________________


04.



__________________________________________________


05.



__________________________________________________


06.



__________________________________________________


07.







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 20 secrets from Secret Submission Post #752.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[philstar22]

Because taking on a pet, an animal domesticated by humans, makes us responsible for them. We domesticated them, we made them into pets, then we took them into our homes. We made them what they are. We have a responsibility to care for them and love them and treat them right. Farming is different. Those animals were domesticated for food primarily, not primarily as pets. We still have responsibility for them, but it is different. And still, if someone takes one into their home and raises it entirely as a pet first, then I don't think they should be eaten. But if they raise it outside as a food animal but also befriend it like a pet then that's okay and I think eating it would be okay.

[(Anonymous)]

That is such an odd limit. What about places (even in the US) where dogs/cats are treated no differently from a cow. They are outside, they do a job, and might get some pats. Are those okay to be eaten? Why not? They were never intended to be a pet. They are always just an animal with a job that are dispensable.

[philstar22]

That's probably fine, if they are job animals.

[(Anonymous)]

I mean...waste not want not.