Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2021-07-01 05:55 pm
[ SECRET POST #5291 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5291 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Supernatural prequel, Jared Padalecki]
__________________________________________________
03.

[9-1-1 Lone Star]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Game of Thrones]
__________________________________________________
05.

[The Untamed/Labyrinth]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 05 secrets from Secret Submission Post #756.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
Wow, this is just like kink-shaming. 'You said this so you approve of that!!'
Gimme a fucking break.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-07-02 12:41 am (UTC)(link)Also, unless you're saying that perving on assholes is your kink, you definitely don't know what 'kink-shaming' is.
no subject
I haven't attacked anyone - anon's have basically said 'you approve of doxxing people!!' which I nowhere said I did. Please link to me the comments where I approved of doxxing. Please link the comments where I 'attacked' anyone.
Or did you just conveniently skip over the 'I hate Tabaqui' anon who bops in here every few months to find something to interact with me about so they can say how much they hate me?
If me replying with my opinion about an actor's on-stage behavior, and how it's been reported and talked about in the news and on fandom sites for the last 15 years is 'stanning' or 'defending someone's honor', then wow, that happens *all the time* here.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-07-02 01:32 am (UTC)(link)I for one think that you added to the discussion and your remarks were interesting and on topic.
Wtf that anon, it's not like we are prohibited from correcting facts because it's not enough hate on JP.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-07-02 01:10 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-07-02 06:04 am (UTC)(link)Jared has been known to poke Misha (I don't know about other people?) in the balls/crotch when they're shooting his coverage or he's delivering his lines.
I couldn't remember all the "pranks" discussed over the years, but found a writeup:
jared once poured $600 worth of coins in misha’s car, which he used to transport his kids. this actually rendered the seatbelts unusable, which put misha in danger. jared actively acknowledges that misha’s first son had just been born and he had no time to get it fixed, so he’d been driving around with no seatbelt.
jared loosened the screws on the bike rack on misha’s car. misha had to sit him down and explain to him that it could have killed someone.
jared once rear ended misha’s car because misha took “his” parking spot. in response, misha parked his car close to jared’s driver side door so he would have to get in through the passenger side. in retaliation, he let all the air out of misha’s tires, which led to misha calling caa so they could fill them. he considered having jared’s car towed while they were there, but jared came out before that happened. he then informed misha that if he had towed his car, he would have totalled misha’s.
Honestly? This seems like really weird, targeted bullying aimed at Misha in particular, but even if it's just cOmeDy PrAnkS, Jared doesn't always know when to stop.
That's why I think he can be a liability and Jensen knows it.
no subject
I personally think pranks are stupid and can way too quickly escalate to insane heights, and yes, JP seems like the kind of person who doesn't know when to quit.
I *really* side-eyed his putting that out on Twitter - that was low, and passive-aggressive, and attention seeking in the worst kind of way.
no subject
lmfao
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-07-02 02:04 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-07-02 02:28 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-07-02 02:44 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Saying the secret was petty is my opinion of the secret - page back and see people saying a lot nastier things to other secrets in the history of F!S.
No, it was not in response to what I said about the secret, but what I said to other anon about his on-set behavior, and how me relating information that's been all over fandom and the internet for 15 years somehow means I approve of doxxing and stan JP, which is pretty hilarious considering a) always been a Dean girl, JP has never come into it and b) been pretty much asexual most of my life.
DA
(Anonymous) 2021-07-02 02:59 am (UTC)(link)Re: DA
I believe hater!Anon is convinced I'm a huge JP fan, slavering for his body, and so am happy to ignore him doxxing people which, frankly, I had no clue about because I don't follow actor's real life stuff as a rule. If the nastiness hadn't been shoved right in my face with the first comment, I'd have said something to that, but unfortunately, hater!Anon just kept piling on the nasty, so, i merely addressed that, instead, and the doxxing in other replies.
Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2021-07-02 03:09 am (UTC)(link)Not everyone is out to get you. It's just a lot of people have low tolerance for something like doxxing, and I honestly don't know how you didn't hear about it since it EXPLODED and had at least one or two secrets on here that I can distinctly recall. The doxxing was news EVERYWHERE, and a lot of people brought it up ad nausium.
Re: DA
No, i had no clue about his doxxing anyone. I honestly don't remember a single discussion about it or secret, either. But then, if you ask me what yesterday's secrets were about, I couldn't tell you. My memory is fairly fucked most of the time.
A good friend of mine clued me into this newest bit of wank via a post on their journal; apparently some fans were threatening JA, and the nastiness from fans seemed to be spilling over onto friends and even family.
THAT is why I find this secret petty, because it seems kinda gross to be so gleeful about something that caused a lot of upset and ugliness.
Glad we could speak 'face to face', Anon.
Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2021-07-02 03:35 am (UTC)(link)Re: DA
Re: DA
(Anonymous) - 2021-07-02 03:47 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
Re: DA
(Anonymous) - 2021-07-02 04:13 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-07-02 03:02 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-07-02 03:11 am (UTC)(link)I would dare you to check your comment and the response to see what you were actually replying to, but I doubt you have the integrity to actually apologize to all the people you've attacked on false pretenses tonight.
no subject
It's pretty easy to see what comment I was replying to -I'm just about the only person in the thread who isn't anon, so not sure what point it is you're trying to make with that.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-07-02 04:54 am (UTC)(link)