case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2021-08-14 06:42 pm

[ SECRET POST #5335 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5335 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 35 secrets from Secret Submission Post #764.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2021-08-15 12:09 am (UTC)(link)
I feel like being able to deal with watching things with parts that have aged poorly is something human beings should be able to do

(Anonymous) 2021-08-15 12:12 am (UTC)(link)
There's a difference between that and the exact same movie coming out today, meant to appeal to today and comment on today

(Anonymous) 2021-08-15 01:32 am (UTC)(link)
I think that depends very much on why something has aged poorly. There are things that were deemed perfectly acceptable a few decades ago that would be considered actively repulsive now*, and outside of maybe a history of film class, there's really no need for new viewers to subject themselves to that.

*some of which were actively repulsive when the work was created, they just didn't bother straight white Christian dudes, so no one gave a shit.