Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2021-08-28 04:35 pm
[ SECRET POST #5349 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5349 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 41 secrets from Secret Submission Post #766.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: "You can't headcanon a detail that already has canon"?
(Anonymous) 2021-08-28 09:41 pm (UTC)(link)that's what i thought the concept was about at least tbh but i don't particularly care
Re: "You can't headcanon a detail that already has canon"?
(Anonymous) 2021-08-28 10:04 pm (UTC)(link)Re: "You can't headcanon a detail that already has canon"?
(Anonymous) 2021-08-29 01:32 am (UTC)(link)For instance, there's a character in one of my canons who is shown to be very flirtatious with women but who also has a very deep, emotionally intimate relationship with another male character. You can headcanon that this character is bi and has more-than-platonic feelings for the male character, but you can't headcanon him as being gay because canon makes it very clear that he is also attracted to women.
Re: "You can't headcanon a detail that already has canon"?
(Anonymous) 2021-08-29 05:00 am (UTC)(link)If that is what OP meant, they are operating on a very outdated definition of headcanon.