[ SECRET POST #5383 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5383 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.











__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for doki doki literature club and friday night funkin]













































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #770.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[fscom]

06. https://64.media.tumblr.com/a9ff24e45d23a46c3e8a37e6695e94fa/4a17a5f7875d2e9b-df/s640x960/6323708d6761d851b6d446a9d75766b48dd58d16.png

[philstar22]

100% agree with this. And people who write villains in-character and don't woobify them still get people claiming they are woobifying them if they don't call them complete, pure evil every other sentence.

[meadowphoenix]

Gotta agree, and honestly I'm more fine with OTT woobifying because it's so clearly for the author than I am with less than the canon nuance villain characterization, since that's usually reflective of a very annoying fandom fight. Honestly I consider it bashing or bashing adjacent.

[(Anonymous)]

Totally agreed and it's really annoying. Character bashing is still annoying when you do it to the villains, guys.