Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2021-10-14 06:09 pm
[ SECRET POST #5396 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5396 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 31 secrets from Secret Submission Post #772.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-10-15 03:13 am (UTC)(link)I did not say anything about prioritization at all (also, this would be true for people with functional reproductive organs of all sexes). I was commenting on the fact that it is weird not to acknowledge that something that affects reproductive health might affect all parts of it, that this isn't about a warning just being strapped on. It also wouldn't necessarily be considered a negative thing for some people.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-10-15 04:19 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-10-15 06:33 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-10-15 09:31 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-10-15 09:36 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-10-15 09:51 am (UTC)(link)Though the possibility would obviously be higher in medication that directly effects hormones like puberty blockers do, that’s completely true. I just didn’t see anon say anywhere that the warning shouldn’t exist at all, whether on the box, or from the doctor prescribing it. Just that the warning shouldn’t be this be all end all for whether the person decides to take it or not. It should obviously be a consideration if it would bother them, of course.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-10-15 09:57 am (UTC)(link)