[ SECRET POST #5425 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5425 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________









05. [WARNING for discussion of pedophilia]




__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for discussion of dub/non-con]

[The Untamed]


__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of child sexual abuse/bomb threats]














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #776.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

You're really trying hard to make this an example of bad-faith reading, aren't you? No matter how much you want this to be true, vaginas are not traditionally to be expected in gay porn with dudes. Just because someone doesn't use the most inclusive language possible in a fandomsecret doesn't mean they're a transphobe.

[(Anonymous)]

well for one, please read my comment again - im not the anon you were talking to, im not trying hard to do anything, since i only made one comment.
i also nowhere called op a transphobe, so if we're going to be talking about bad faith reading then you should perhaps look at how you reacted to my comment.
what i said was: i doubt the sincerity. that is what you are reacting so strongly to. if we accept that your strong reaction is due to the implications of my words, maybe we can accept that it is possible for the secret to have implications too?

[(Anonymous)]

And what implications would those be?

[(Anonymous)]

cmon man just scroll up