[ SECRET POST #5442 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5442 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 29 secrets from Secret Submission Post #779.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

AYRT

[(Anonymous)]

And that’s fair enough. I get why labeling anyone criticizing a work that deals with trans stories and themes as a TERF is unhelpful to any conversation. Because there is a clear difference between honest good-faith criticism, and being transphobic. The leap to accuse someone of the latter should only be done when it’s clearly correct to call them that. Otherwise, it’s needlessly attacking someone for harmless critique of a work of fiction.

But you have to admit, the the anon I was talking to saying “they have a point lol” to someone saying this book was review bombed by TERFs doesn’t look good, and is incredibly poorly-phrased if they didn’t mean it that way.