[ SECRET POST #5450 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5450 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 22 secrets from Secret Submission Post #779.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: SA

[(Anonymous)]

The 14 year old in question was the person commenting, not a minor they were responsible for. The request to justify why they were in there had so many layers of puritanical bullshit to it.

Re: SA

[(Anonymous)]

I know? I never said the 14 year old was a minor they were responsible for. It’s pretty clear that they are telling this story about themselves when they were 14. And in a lot of countries, 14 would be considered a minor, and not let into a sex toy shop. But either way, they already answered that it’s because the owner didn’t stop them, so the question was answered.

I also never asked them to justify themselves, or passed judgment on them in any way. My comment was mainly pointing out how it’s weird to call someone a fandom Puritan when this anecdote doesn’t involve fandom at all.