[ SECRET POST #5462 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5462 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 31 secrets from Secret Submission Post #782.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Spoiler rant

[meadowphoenix]

it does seem more like the norm is moving toward having to proactively avoid than everyone having the courtesy of waiting for a period of time, but I think if the new movie was tagged then you're going to have a difficult time determining when courtesy tag norms apply when people eventually do want happenings to be tagged.

Re: Spoiler rant

[(Anonymous)]

It is moving back to the norm of people just talking about the things they are excited about, and those wanting to not hear about it to take personal responsibility of staying out of those spaces it is likely to be discussed in. It was the spoilershaming era that was the deviation.

Re: Spoiler rant

[(Anonymous)]

You’re delusional. Spoilers-shaming was getting mad at people for saying how many chapters a game has, or what genre a movie was because they had no idea what a spoiler really was, and considered anything a spoiler. You’re using that term erroneously.

The reality of what you consider spoiler-shaming is people not seeking out spaces talking about the movie, or being in general spaces where it’s expected to at least tag spoilers, and being justifiably angry that they’re spoiled anyway in the most random places. Where people aren’t always just talking about things that excite them with others. Like the person who snuck a spoiler into a tag on AO3 in OP’s comment.

The fact that you consider it a “personal responsibility” of the person who doesn’t want to be spoiled and takes the proper measures as such, and not the responsibility of the people doing the spoiling with no consideration for where they are or who could see, is absurd. The only way people who don’t want to get spoiled can be “responsible” by your definition is to not talk to anyone or use the internet at all before they see the movie. Because it’s the “right” of everyone to just drop spoilers anywhere they want, and they have no reason to take strangers into account at all. You really have to be trolling if you can’t see how stupid this sounds.

Re: Spoiler rant

[meadowphoenix]

Considering that George's father asking Susan's father not to "spoil" Firestorm was a bit in 1995 on Seinfeld and "places it is likely to be discussed in" might as well have been a meaningless term then, I do not think you're correct about the original shape of the norm of spoiling in general.

If you mean online specifically, that's also not true from my experience, and especially less so for mixed media forums unless it was a marked page.