case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2021-12-26 04:18 pm

[ SECRET POST #5469 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5469 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 40 secrets from Secret Submission Post #783.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
meadowphoenix: (Default)

[personal profile] meadowphoenix 2021-12-26 11:36 pm (UTC)(link)
It's very disingenuous to suggest that learning background information, especially horrific background information, of the creation of public media is the same thing as someone proactively and deliberately changing the public media itself. While your view of the creator might affect your view of the media, that doesn't mean you can logically conflate the two.

And while I too think you should at least have a care before you enlarge a canon in a way that affects previous canon information, this is not relevant in the secret-givers' point which is adaptation, not new canon.