case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2022-01-16 04:26 pm

[ SECRET POST #5490 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5490 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 32 secrets from Secret Submission Post #786.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: NFTs - SA

(Anonymous) 2022-01-18 03:59 am (UTC)(link)
Exactly. They think that having That. Specific. Digital. File. is special. I saw recently that an e-sports gamer was selling the skin he used in a video game as an NFT. As "his skin". It's just a digital copy, like all digital things are. Anyone can play with that skin. It's one of the set provided in the game, not something exclusive to him. They want people to acknowledge that they have a "special" one that is worth more than any other thing that is exactly like it. They're trying to make fungible things non-fungible, with no mechanism of how to enforce that.

Basically, they think that someday, having that "special" digital skin that in all ways is the same that everyone else has, will have the same value that having a physical copy of the game signed by the player would have. Something that actually is non-fungible.