[ SECRET POST #5509 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5509 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.
[Milgram]


























__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS]


























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #787.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Secret maker but not the OP

[(Anonymous)]

But all it says before the secret is SPOILERS, not SPOILERS for [Name of Series] like it usually does. Case has always been passive-aggressive about not labeling spoiler warnings with names if the secret maker says "spoilers" and only puts the name of the series in the secret. One time there was a secret about a book with the title on the cover, but since I guess the secret maker didn't say "Spoilers for [Name of Book] in the submission, Case marked it "SPOILERS for this." That's just intentionally being a snarky asshole. You didn't do anything wrong; Case chose to mark your spoilers in the most unhelpful manner possible.

Re: Secret maker but not the OP

[(Anonymous)]

...no. I'm not sure why you're so determined to blame Case or paint this decision with such unwarranted negativity, but please stop.

A secret maker

Re: Secret maker but not the OP

[(Anonymous)]

You’re disingenuously reading too much into this just to be an asshole to Case, and inserting passive aggressiveness where there clearly isn’t any. And you’re doing this against the secret maker’s wishes at that, so please heed their words and stop twisting reality into a pretzel just to have something to be mad at Case for.

And I don’t even disagree with you on hey hey hey (as usual)being a bit of an unnecessarily snarky dick about putting in a spoiler warning for an old show. I agree that spoiler warnings hurt nobody, and that it doesn’t matter how old the media is, they’re still helpful to people who haven’t seen/read the work yet. But everything is else you wrote about Case being bad for some reason was complete bs.