[ SECRET POST #5510 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5510 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________


06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 63 secrets from Secret Submission Post #788.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I think it's fun, but the end where all the earlier parts go on simultaneously annoys me. It's just chaotic. There's one in Hamilton the same and I'm like ARGH.

[(Anonymous)]

Are you one of those people that think this style of song is a LMM thing and not a music theatre thing in general

[deleted_scenes]

Both Les Mis and Miss Saigon have simultaneous parts and they are not nearly as chaotic as that part in Bruno. Even REPO! The Genetic Opera has sing-over-each other parts in Everyone's A Composer and Cut the Ties and they're coherent IMO.

Not a big musical person so those were the only references I could think of.

[(Anonymous)]

It's... Supposed to be chaotic. That's the point. The chaoticness is supposed to represent how all their voices are overlapping in Mirabel's head, and how anxious she is. It's brilliant.

[(Anonymous)]

As a fan, I mean... it's fine, it's certainly not brilliant lmao. That's ascribing way too much to it. Encanto is pretty darn good, but nothing in it is amazing enough to be called brilliant.

[(Anonymous)]

You're smarter than the professional musical theorists who have done sound and video breakdowns about why it is in fact brilliant, then. Okay.

[(Anonymous)]

You realize they get paid to do those, right?

[(Anonymous)]

Ah yes, everyone who disagrees with you is a paid shill for Disney, that sure makes sense.

Take the forest out of your ass and recognize your opinion isn't necessarily musical theory.

[(Anonymous)]

I love how AYRT thinks Disney would pay modest YouTubers with music degrees to talk about them. As if they'd waste the money.

[(Anonymous)]

This.

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT Disney doesn't have to pay them when YouTube will for uploading a video about a trending song

[(Anonymous)]

But that has nothing to do with with their opinions. If they’re already getting money from YouTube, they would be getting that money regardless of whether their opinions were positive or negative. So the anon saying “You know they’re getting payed?” in regards to the other anon saying that a YouTuber that has a background in musical theory might just know what they’re talking about is an irrelevant question. It was also a bad attempt at refutation.

Unless Disney themselves were paying them, their opinions being positive were not influenced by getting payed.

[(Anonymous)]

...But negative feedback invariably gets better algorithm. This is legitimately a researched thing: hate clicks generate more more YouTube. More clicks and views = more money.