case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2022-02-07 06:12 pm

[ SECRET POST #5512 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5512 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 42 secrets from Secret Submission Post #789.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2022-02-08 11:22 am (UTC)(link)
SA

And also, the BBC’s cut funding doesn’t automatically indicate censorship or silencing of the press. So it’s a bit extreme and unwarranted to use the BBC as a symbol of democracy as a whole. I agree that democracy is a basic human right, but it’s such a leap to go from “BBC’s funding is being cut, for possibly political reasons” to “BBC is an independent press >> Independent press is a cornerstone of democracy >> BBC represents democracy, and it’s cut funding is maybe a political attempt to silence the press!”. Admittedly, you didn’t say or really imply that last part(although I feel like the original anon I replied who said the secret was “too political” did) to did, but it seems like where this line of thinking might eventually go, as much of a reach as it is.