[ SECRET POST #5515 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5515 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________


06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 12 secrets from Secret Submission Post #789.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

"Acknowledging there are some good cops" is more critical than the majority of the media landscape gets about cops. Most shows that feature cops might occasionally nod to the possibility that there are some bad cops - but not the protags though, the protags will expose them and take them down, without any lasting negative impact on their own careers. Even media that centers criminals as the protagonists will usually treat cops as bumbling obstacles at best, and hero antagonists at worst, and if they do feature a dirty cop, there's a point made of "not all cops though".

I don't personally think there's anything particularly wrong with enjoying police procedurals, any more than I think there's anything wrong with enjoying spy fiction, or fiction about serial killers. But it's silly to pretend that "good cop" fiction isn't the norm, or that the slow turn against cops in progressive spaces has had any real impact on the media landscape.