[ SECRET POST #5532 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5532 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 35 secrets from Secret Submission Post #792.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[meadowphoenix]

No offense, but your not desire is not about being a housewife in the 40s-60s, since you know good and full well at best those shows were about relationships more idealistically respectful than actually representative.

More importantly, all of those housewives think about money and survival, like quite literally in those shows you mentioned. Why do you think Samantha is so worried about fucking up Darren's job? Laura does the household budget! There are multiple episodes in those shows where women talk about the prices of food, of clothes, of class which is very much about the display of money and what they can afford. Many of the real housewives then were solely in charge of the household budget and would be judged on their ability to manage their husband's vices. No offense but there is zero time at which people of any gender did not have survival and money concerns in a way that wasn't specifically about how many resources they actually held.

Your desire is about being cared for in a structured and unsolicited way and being able to give back without taxing yourself. I think most people want something close to that. But no housewife had that certainty either.