[ SECRET POST #5532 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5532 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 35 secrets from Secret Submission Post #792.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[meadowphoenix]

Really? You really can't see the difference between medication as a panacea for non-compliance to an idealistic gender standard and medication which is supposed to specifically apply to a specific ailment so that you can learn other techniques?

It's the difference between going to the doctor and getting amphetamines no matter why you say you can't go to work, and going to the doctor and getting a splint for a broken leg, but aspirin for a headache.

[(Anonymous)]

My understanding had been that this would have been a standard for treatment of mental health issues during the period in general? That that's just what the state of the art for mental health treatment, for treatment of depression for instance, was at the time.

[meadowphoenix]

If you mean, mental health standards were wildly misogynistic then yes. If you mean, similar actions or feelings by unhappy people were treated equally as symptoms and intensities of depression and given similar treatment no matter the gender, then no. Regardless, it's a bit different than the state of psychiatry today.