[ SECRET POST #5551 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5551 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.
[Iron Widow, by Xiran Jay Zhao]



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.
[Venom]


__________________________________________________



04. https://i.imgur.com/M0aDyxc.png
[OP warned for NSFW image]


__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________
















06. [SPOILERS for In Sound Mind]
























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #794.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[meadowphoenix]

No, I didn't know that the study in question looked at men or fully clothed women. I still don't know what study it is.
You know, trying to say something about the efficacy of neuroimaging that implicates literally all data analysis when you haven't looked at or asked for the study and don't know what it's saying does not scream "likes science" to me. My other comments in this thread have several studies.

Also, I feel weirdly horrified that you somehow got "you don't like science" from anything I said.
I think I've been clear how I got there. But to wit, I don't think people who profess skepticism of scientific techniques in a way that implicates all scientific techniques like science. "You have to make choices and use machines therefore the conclusions are unreliable" is a concern with all of science, including chemistry and physics. And people who think they're saying something significant as if efficacy isn't constantly re-adjusted and re-looked and challenged within the field don't really like the idea of science as it exists.