[ SECRET POST #5561 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5561 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 32 secrets from Secret Submission Post #797.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Bullshit. These two cases are not even remotely comparable. One is someone earning money without paying taxes on it even though they would have had to, with the payment service only now enforcing it and them whining about it. The other is a group of people being marginalised because they are not legally recognised as a couple and not having to pay certain taxes because of that and after not being marginalised anymore, they're paying it without bitching about it.

[(Anonymous)]

Those marginalized people in your country still benefit from roads don't they?

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT

Don’t be willfully obtuse, it’s a transparent way of making it clear you’re acting in bad faith.

It’s clear AYRT is for paying taxes in general, and their want for marginalized people to be recognized and treated the same as non-marginalized people is not mutually exclusive to being in favor of paying taxes. Them personally reaping some benefits from a tax loophole that only exists because their relationship isn’t acknowledged, a result of systematic problems that continue to affect marginalized people, isn’t going to lead to societal collapse like roads being left to ruin. And you know that. You’re just a bad faith actor, as I said.

They specifically said, which you conveniently ignored, that they would rather pay taxes than be marginalized. That the small benefit this tax loophole provides isn’t worth being discriminated against.