Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2022-05-01 06:08 pm
[ SECRET POST #5595 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5595 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 35 secrets from Secret Submission Post #800.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-05-02 04:41 am (UTC)(link)It is not OK to look up people's private information even if it's easily accessible. Think about stalkers or obsessed fans who don't understand that a parasocial relationship doesn't mean the relationship is deep/real.
Call me the moral police, this shit is scary.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-05-02 11:28 am (UTC)(link)And yeah, maybe it was a small time personality that overshared personal information. But there’s no reason to assume that’s more likely? Especially because vlogging in 2011 and before wasn’t normally the almost 24/7 coverage that it would later become. It was typically smaller check ins, informaing viewers of upcoming things, some daily routines in their house, and interactions with friends. And I’m not going to pretend this was the majority, but a lot of vlogs only took place in one setting, usually in the vloggers house. Not following them around outside, and showing everywhere and everything.
And some people would still think hoarding that information is weird, regardless. But it’s definitely not a defense if they’re a smaller celebrity or personality.