[ SECRET POST #5640 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5640 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 18 secrets from Secret Submission Post #807.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Honestly, I would much rather a book knows its genre and stays there rather than promising conflict and adventure only to go fluffy and everything just works out.

[(Anonymous)]

This, if you went in being told it was fluffy slice-of-life and got disappointed that it was not an Epic Adventure... I don't know what to tell you.

It's fully okay like the anon above to not WANT to read fluffy slice-of-life, but to be disappointed that it is what it said on the tin seems weird.

[(Anonymous)]

da but being slice-of-life isn't an excuse for having no sort of conflict or character development whatsoever, though? If there's zero conflict or character development that's just plain bad writing, period.

[(Anonymous)]

Fluff can still have character development, though? Even the Smurfs get character growth sometimes. Well, the ones with names anyway.

[(Anonymous)]

Seconding what the two anons above me are saying. You can tell a fluffy story and still incorporate the basic elements of strong storytelling. What makes a story compelling and well-executed isn't actually the size (height?) of the stakes.