case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2022-06-24 05:52 pm

[ SECRET POST #5649 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5649 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.
[Ted Lasso]



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________






















05. [SPOILERS for Jurassic World Dominion]




__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Jurassic World Dominion]




__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of marital infidelity]




__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for discussion of incest]



__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for discussion of child abuse, sexualization of children]





























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #808.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2022-06-25 02:58 am (UTC)(link)
It is!

But I agree with OP that "for science" is a more fun motivator for a villain that "for money" or "for evil", especially in the context of the Jurassic Park movies where "science going too far" has always been a MAJOR theme--along with the money, obviously, but in the OG it was pretty clear that the park was going to have problems even without the money-motivated villains. It would be nice to see the what-if of that conclusion.