case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2022-06-29 05:11 pm

[ SECRET POST #5654 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5654 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 16 secrets from Secret Submission Post #809.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2022-06-30 05:28 am (UTC)(link)
Of course people will bite the bait. They'll bite any woobie bait, and if there isn't, they'll make some themselves with a random background character in love with the villain. And since when has fandom cared at all about what the intended narrative of a piece of media is? Have you been in fandom?

(Anonymous) 2022-06-30 05:48 am (UTC)(link)
DA

This is only a problem if you think that's a bad thing. Reading against the text is one of the things fandom does well, IMO.

(Anonymous) 2022-06-30 10:22 am (UTC)(link)
I mean, speak for yourself ig because I find that when I'm in a fandom for something that has good writing, people generally care about where a creator is taking the story. Fans may disagree on interpretations but they're not blatantly substituting their own realities (except in fanfic, which is an imaginative exercise anyway). Then I've also been in fandoms where canon is disowned and fanon reigns, but there's usually a reason for that...