[ SECRET POST #5713 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5713 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________



11.



__________________________________________________



12.



__________________________________________________



13.



__________________________________________________



14.



__________________________________________________



15.



__________________________________________________



16.



__________________________________________________



17.



__________________________________________________



18.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 115 secrets from Secret Submission Post #818 .
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[meadowphoenix]

I don't know what any of that has to do with what I said, which is that there are actually two distinct genres, physical crimes and psychological crime, broadly, and the fandom for psychological crime is more recent. And people saying something about "true crime" are very rightly not mentioning psychological crime, which isn't being marketed as the same thing.

so, let be more specific. When do you see the fandom aspects of non-physical crime beginning, such that you do think its wholly considered within the genre of "true crime" and people are fully ignoring that.

most people would agree it's inaccurate to judge the entire fandom by its revolting vocal minority
a) most people are in fact okay with judging fandoms by their loudest members. I don't really care if they say differently, nobody is looking a fandom from a holistic experience, they literally can't.
b) I don't think in experience-based situations that's incorrect or for the point of it all, inaccurate as a judgement, since the loudest people dictate the experience
b) you've said this isn't even the minority, so....