[ SECRET POST #5757 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5757 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 43 secrets from Secret Submission Post #824.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[fscom]

05. https://i.imgur.com/cJCPAOL.jpg

[(Anonymous)]

Better than the original?

[(Anonymous)]

I have a lot of nostalgic love for that movie! The jingle will stay in my head forever.

[philstar22]

I like it. I like 1 and 2 better, but I like it. The first three are the only ones I like. I don't like any of the subsequent ones or the remakes.

It might be a decent movie, but it's a terrible sequel.

[(Anonymous)]

It should not have been a part of the franchise at all. I know the story and maybe if Halloween II (1981) hadn't been made, then I could see it. But Halloween II was made, and it continued the original story, so swerving to a completely different story was really confusing. It was also annoying to me, as someone who loved Halloween (1978) and really liked Halloween II (1981) and was expecting a follow-up (not that I thought the next one up was that great).

[(Anonymous)]

Lmao

I liked the Druids wanting to take over the world part of the plot, and the masks were cool (I always wanted a pumpkin one lol), but this one shoulda been stand-alone movie and not part of the franchise.

[(Anonymous)]

This is one of my faves too.

[terrorgutz]

Halloween 3 is one of those movies I feel you gotta view separately from the rest of the franchise. It's like Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 to me, where a lot of people are split on it, especially when comparing it to the first film. I love TCM 2 as it is, disconnected from the franchise/the first movie. I get how people can get upset that Halloween 3 is a completely different thing from the rest of the franchise. I will say it definitely was a weird choice to include it in the Halloween franchise, but more excusable since it was the early stages of the franchise and they wanted to experiment with some different ideas.

[greghousesgf]

it was originally not meant to be part of the Halloween franchise which is why no Michael

[(Anonymous)]

that wasn't my understanding?

the story that I had always heard was that John Carpenter just didn't think that there was scope for any more Michael Moore movies and the plan was to turn the Halloween series into an anthology horror concept

[greghousesgf]

maybe I heard wrong

[(Anonymous)]

No, I've heard that too. But I think the studio found that too radical a concept.

[(Anonymous)]

Yes. The plan was originally for the Halloween series to be an anthology horror series, not to be a series of Michael Myers movies. But after I & II, people expected III to be another Myers movie, so III flopped and they dropped the anthology concept.