[ SECRET POST #5770 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5770 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________



11.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 58 secrets from Secret Submission Post #826.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Doctor Who

[(Anonymous)]

Why is bringing Ten back nothing but wankery, whereas other multi-doctor episodes are acceptable?

Re: Doctor Who

[(Anonymous)]

Because he's not actually supposed to be 10. He's supposed to be 14. It's not bringing back 10, like the crossover episodes. It's trying to sneak in an ostrich by claiming it's a smoothy.

Re: Doctor Who

[(Anonymous)]

This. It's Ten But Also Fourteen. That's what's so egregious.

Re: Doctor Who

[(Anonymous)]

I honestly don't understand what the problem with this is. To me it feels like it's basically just a slight re-arrangement of previous versions of multi-doctor stories. I don't know whether they'll use it to tell a good story or a bad story but I really don't see what the fuss is - OK, so he's 14 with the face of 10, it's a different concept, so what? And I'm really curious why it's so intrinsically bad.

Re: Doctor Who

[(Anonymous)]

Meh. At this point I don't even care as long as it has better writing.

Re: Doctor Who

[(Anonymous)]

You sound like you don't understand the difference between Watsonian and Doylist perspectives (or in-universe and behind-the-scenes perspectives, if you prefer). From a Doylist perspective, them bringing back Tennant and calling him 14 was done for audience popularity. If he's not really going to be back on the show for very long, in-universe it doesn't really matter what number he is. Fans care about the number. The characters don't.

Re: Doctor Who

[(Anonymous)]

From a Watsonian perspective, the characters don't know the difference and it doesn't matter, sure. From a Doylist perspective, it's annoying and fanservicey as FUCK.

Re: Doctor Who

[(Anonymous)]

This