[ SECRET POST #5775 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5775 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[The Murderbot Chronicles]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Witchfinder General]


__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.
[The Mermaid Princess's Guilty Meal]


__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.
[Arknights]


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________



































11. [SPOILERS for The Rings of Power]




__________________________________________________



12. [SPOILERS for Person of Interest]




__________________________________________________



13. [SPOILERS for Mary Skelter 2]




__________________________________________________



14. [WARNING for discussion of abuse]




__________________________________________________



15. [WARNING for discussion of rape(-revenge films? this is here just in case)]































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #826.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

This is a really weird take, and it makes no sense.

You really think it makes you look good when you make fun of people you disagree with, and accuse them of misogyny because they like to...read about female characters? “I’m not like other girls, I like female characters”? That’s not what being an NLOG is. Just accusing someone of being an NLOG means nothing if there’s no societal precedence for the behavior beyond your own anecdotal experience, especially if the behavior of the person you’re calling an NLOG is actually supportive of other women.

And claiming it’s misogyny to like to read about or to appreciate female characters is disingenuous. Your last post had you specifically say that you don’t think the female characters people like are actually good, even though you have no idea what characters are being thought of in this instance. This is just transparently your bias talking. You’re unintentionally demonstrating the points of the anon who says m/m only shippers frequently embody some internalized misogyny, because they claim it’s because the female characters aren’t written well enough, but they will never be written well enough for you. Several anons have said trying to justify why you only like m/m besides just finding it the most personally appealing is where the misogyny usually kicks in, and you showed that. And you say you’re proud of that and don’t mind having that internalized misogyny, but you’re acting way too defensive for that to be true. You started with “I’m fine with only liking m/m, and the female characters aren’t that good anyways”, and then jump to “Actually, it’s the people that like reading about female characters, especially f/f shippers, that are the REAL misogynists!”. You’ve given nothing to support that point of view, so it doesn’t make any sense, and just shows your hypocrisy and lack of self-awareness.