case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2022-10-31 07:11 pm

[ SECRET POST #5778 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5778 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Jack Septiceye]


__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.
[The Addams Family]


__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.
[CSI]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Star Trek: First Contact]


__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________



11.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 52 secrets from Secret Submission Post #827.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2022-11-01 07:34 am (UTC)(link)
DA - I mean, the words you used were "very explicit BDSM things." If there was vore, or nonconsensual oviposition, or forced feminization and physical gender reassignment, or they put him in diapers and brainwashed him to believe he was a baby, or any number of other genuinely "out there" things, then describing that as "BDSM things" is inaccurate.

So I can see where AYRT is coming from in saying it doesn't sound that out there.

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2022-11-01 10:22 am (UTC)(link)
My dude, I'm sorry that you wanted more description on every exact kink I read that I had apparently been too stupid to believe fell under the bdsm umbrella, but I was trying to make a secret where the font size wasn't so tiny that it would be unreadable for people to read.