Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2022-11-07 09:02 pm
[ SECRET POST #5785 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5785 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 39 secrets from Secret Submission Post #828.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-11-08 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)I don’t think that OP or anyone else should have to be clear or specific about their personal opinions on the subject of the secrets. But it does help the community engagement aspect of the reply section sometimes. Unless the subject of the secret is enough to start conversations. It isn’t in this case. That’s not bad, but it’s not good. And wanting to know more isn’t always demanding more, so I disagree with those that say you are being demanding.
And yeah, Google obviously wouldn’t cut it in this case, because you’re not as interested in the subject as the opinions of the person behind the secret. That’s understandable. But I guess we’ll never know more, and that’s the way it goes sometimes.