case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2022-12-11 03:59 pm

[ SECRET POST #5819 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5819 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 38 secrets from Secret Submission Post #833.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Watching/reading analysis without consuming the original media

(Anonymous) 2022-12-12 12:44 am (UTC)(link)
I definitely do this. If I think the person doing the analysis is interesting on their own terms, then I'm not really going to worry if I'm familiar with the underlying work.

I watch/read more analysis where I know the commentator but not the source material than I do vice versa. Most people who talk about media don't have anything interesting to say. So it's very rare that I'll go and actively seek out analysis for something I've seen.

Re: Watching/reading analysis without consuming the original media

(Anonymous) 2022-12-12 01:04 am (UTC)(link)
Well said! I was trying to work out why I also do this before reading your comment, but I think you got it exactly. The few commentators I like are able to be interesting and insightful whether I know the media or not. And in my experience, that’s a serious minority of commentators.