[ SECRET POST #5825 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5825 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 46 secrets from Secret Submission Post #834.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

'if I don't want to have sex with a man that used to be a woman because I'm not attracted to men that used to be female'

Please point to your issue with this statement.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

DA

But I’m guessing that what they mean by that is that the anon they were replying to didn’t just say they weren’t attracted to men or women. They said they weren’t attracted to men who used to be women. It might be their preference, and nobody should try to change their mind, but it is still discriminatory against trans men specifically. They do at least refer to trans men as men, even though they feel the need to say they “used to be women”. So that’s unnecessary, but still better than misgendering a trans man?

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

Bullshit. It's not discriminatory to not be attracted to somebody.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

It fucking is when you express your non-attraction on the same level as putting "no fats, no femmes, no blacks, no asians" in a Grindr profile.