[ SECRET POST #5884 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5884 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.
[Eurovision]



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 32 secrets from Secret Submission Post #842.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Her “performance of conventional femininity” isn’t what she’s lauded for. She’s lauded for her song writing, her tireless work ethic, her business acumen, and her insistence on self-determination in an industry that is known for treating its top performers like golden geese.

I actually agree with you that her songs aren’t that deep. But I disagree with you that her song-writing ability is “somewhat above average.” That’s like saying Max Martin’s song-writing ability is somewhat above average, when the man has cranked out decades worth of hits like a soft-serve machine cranks out ice cream. In reality, both Taylor Swift and Max Martin are basically pop song writing geniuses. The fact that their songs usually aren’t that deep is neither here nor there. Depth isn’t the only metric by which a song-writer’s skill can be measured. And I say that as someone who tends to prefer “deep” indie shit over mainstream bops.

[(Anonymous)]

Great post!