[ SECRET POST #5888 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5888 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 41 secrets from Secret Submission Post #843.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Fuck Elon Musk with a cactus

[(Anonymous)]

Be careful what you call misinformation.

https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2022-003567_EN.html

https://www.epa.gov/radtown/radioactive-wastes-coal-fired-power-plants

https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/43/035/43035329.pdf

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/coal-ash-is-more-radioactive-than-nuclear-waste/

https://www.sciencefocus.com/science/do-coal-fired-power-stations-produce-radioactive-waste/

Re: Fuck Elon Musk with a cactus

[(Anonymous)]

I never doubted that, I know this. The misinformation is, as anon above stated, that "Coal ash is more radioactive than nuclear waste" which no. No it fucking is not.
Quoted from one of the very articles you posted: "As a general clarification, ounce for ounce, coal ash released from a power plant delivers more radiation than nuclear waste shielded via water or dry cask storage."
So no, nuclear waste is still much, much higher in radiation. It's just shielded, unlike coal ash.