[ SECRET POST #5908 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5908 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Tombstone - Kurt Russell and Val Kilmer]



__________________________________________________



03.
[The Other Boleyn Girl]



__________________________________________________



04.
[Mass Effect]



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________




















08. [SPOILERS for Iron Widow]




__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for inevitable JKR wank]




__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for discussion of antisemitism]




__________________________________________________



11. [WARNING for possible discussion of sexual abuse]


































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #845.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I just absolutely guarantee you that there are many, many creators out there who disagree with you. Just an absolutely huge number.

And there was about 4 days between the revisions being announced and them announcing they would continue to sell the original versions (and IMO there's almost no chance that they were ever going to stop selling them entirely). Again I don't really think it makes sense to change the language either, I just don't think it matters much, especially when these companies are clearly willing to continue selling the old versions, which are extremely easy to find if you want to. It's just not that big of a deal.

[(Anonymous)]

Several authors have decided to change their own works, which is a different thing to someone else changing the work. Several authors expressed horror at an estate changing the works of a deceased creator. Some of those were the same people. I wouldn’t be surprised if some trusts/estates have been redrafted to prevent this happening to works created by contemporary, living authors.

The plan was to change the books and then a few days later they scrapped that idea because of the backlash. There was never any intent to sell both versions side by side.

[(Anonymous)]

according to this they're selling both versions

https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Family/proposed-roald-dahl-books-spark-backlash/story?id=97350999

"The Roald Dahl Classic Collection" from the Penguin imprint will feature the original texts of 17 of Dahl's children's books while the publisher said they would also keep the recently published and separate Roald Dahl books for young readers under the Puffin imprint. The Puffin versions of Dahl's books are meant for younger readers who are new to reading.

[(Anonymous)]

Ah I hadn’t seen that! What I saw was they were changing them and then they backtracked and were leaving the originals up for sale. I think this is a soft step and it still leaves a bad taste because it wasn’t the author’s choice but at least they’re not erasing his word choices completely yet.

DA

[(Anonymous)]

A push against being able to edit old books would be as bad a push for requiring it (i.e. censorship). It's an attempt to control people's freedom to choose what they read. If some people want Roald Dahl stories without casual reminders that the author hated them, and there are publishers willing to give it to them, that's simply them being able to choose their reading experience more freely. If other people want the original versions because they're purists or want to use them as a teaching tool about bigotry (or ya know, they agree with his views which makes them suck, but hatred still isn't and shouldn't be illegal), that's also their choice and no edited versions of the books existing alongside them is taking it away.

[(Anonymous)]

>I wouldn’t be surprised if some trusts/estates have been redrafted to prevent this happening to works created by contemporary, living authors.

Oh, I hope so.