Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2023-04-21 10:57 am
[ SECRET POST #5950 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5950 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07. [SPOILERS for The Starry Love (cdrama)]

__________________________________________________
08. [WARNING for discussion of violence/homophobia]

__________________________________________________
09. [WARNING for HP/JKR/transphobia discussion]

__________________________________________________
10. [WARNING for HP/JKR/transphobia/abuse discussion]

__________________________________________________
11. [WARNING for discussion of fertility problems/miscarriage]

__________________________________________________
12. [WARNING for discussion of RL war/abortion/racism/etc]

__________________________________________________
13. [WARNING for discussion of mental health issues]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #850.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
https://i.imgur.com/YKIsYEu.jpg
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-04-21 04:31 pm (UTC)(link)Could also have something to do with the fact that fandom as an entity is a lot more accepting of the "hate Whedon, still love Buffy" stance, while still vilifying anyone who dares to admit they may still have fond feelings about HP. Which may have something to do with the above point, may just be fannish posturing, or may be some mix of the two.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-04-22 04:56 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-04-21 06:12 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-04-21 06:49 pm (UTC)(link)Even OP isn't saying that his abuse is NBD - they're just saying that, in their opinion, it doesn't show up on screen in BTVS.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-04-21 07:05 pm (UTC)(link)And ykw, he's a thousand times worse than JKR.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-04-21 07:07 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-04-22 01:57 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-04-22 04:03 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-04-21 10:27 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-04-22 10:20 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-04-21 06:50 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-04-21 06:58 pm (UTC)(link)he's a fucking scumbag to real human beings who are near him in real life, but that's a relatively small number of people. Whedon isn't donating huge chunks of his personal fortune to support laws to make spousal abuse legal again, you feel me? He's not contributing to endangering thousands of people on a vast impersonal institutional scale. And he might have a liiittle more ability to be a douchebag insulated from consequences by remaining "creator of beloved series BTVS" but since at this point it's always "now-reviled creator of beloved series BTVS", that doesn't seem like a huge amount of additional power to cause harm for him.
Whereas JKR is absolutely using both her clout and her money to actively endanger and oppress an entire population of queer people. So I can't justify (or. like. bear?) to contribute to that, and it poisons my old affection for the thing way more deeply.
Also TV is just a far, far more collaborative medium than books. He created/captained Buffy but he didn't write every episode, he didn't direct every episode or make every acting choice, etc. JKR had editors who clearly had no sway over her for the last 3 books and I'm sure people she bounced ideas off of, but...every word in there is ultimately hers. It's a much tighter identification of media with creator.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-04-21 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)also, I support Buffy to support the people who worked on it and gave their all for it in spite of what Joss was doing to them at the time - Charisma, Michelle, Sarah Michelle, etc. they had to put up with his shit and still turned out an amazing story with good characters due to their performances. it's like supporting Daniel and Emma and Rupert in spite of whatever the fuck was happening backstage on the HP movies. they all, at least, have their heads on straight.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-04-21 07:12 pm (UTC)(link)But another part of it for me is that HP fandom has always been extremely commercial so liking it at the very least makes it seem like complicity. And there’s loads of unlicensed merch out there but showing HP love is a harmful message to vulnerable people and just because JK is a steaming pile of shit it doesn’t mean theft is suddenly ok.
(I’m talking straight up merch, not fanworks, not even fanworks for sale. The Cricut made vinyl shirts and the glittery resin coasters and all that stuff)
no subject
And Joss, it seems, also knows when to shut his fucking mouth (eventually) and keep his head down. Jo, on the other hand, keeps tweeting and digging the hole she's in deeper and deeper, comfortably swirling at the bottom of the whirlpool she swam into. All because she doesn't know how to mind her own business and enjoy her billion dollars.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-04-21 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)Ding!Ding!Ding! We have a winner!
If JW was all over social media complaining that actually he's the littlest victim and all these women have too many rights these days, if he was literally writing books where his expy gets murdered by an enraged, pregnant career woman, if he publicly and proudly gave millions of dollars to MRA lobbyists while constantly bragging that anybody who watches anything he's touched obviously agrees with all his actions, he might taint his former works beyond repair.
Maybe not though, since JKR does do all that shit and keeps churning out mediocre HP content and the most that's come of it is sometimes people are mean to her online.
no subject
You know what? I'd read that book.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-04-22 01:33 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-04-22 12:46 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-04-22 12:47 am (UTC)(link)no subject