case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2023-05-19 07:09 pm

[ SECRET POST #5978 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5978 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________
















08. [WARNING for discussion of non-con]




__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for discussion of abuse]




























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #854.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2023-05-20 12:39 am (UTC)(link)
I think it depends on what you consider non-con. Which is somewhat a matter of opinion when it comes to fictional sex. The author of FSOG doesn't consider what she wrote to be non-con, and in-universe it's not treated like non-con, so a lot of it is how much you accept the rules of the canon universe as different from the rules of reality, and how much you consider the MC's feelings and reactions to the sex as indications that she's not fully consenting, etc. Game of Thrones has more non-con in that it was fully written with the intent of being rape/non-con, no debates. Especially the TV show.