case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2023-05-22 10:50 pm

[ SECRET POST #5981 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5981 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 38 secrets from Secret Submission Post #855.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2023-05-23 10:33 pm (UTC)(link)
AYRT

You're pretending I (and the anon you responded to first) were making an argument that we did not make. No one said the only or primary reason to oppose the current push for AI is because the quality it can produce is crap. What they said, and I agree, is that people championing "replace creativity with AI" arguments seem oblivious to the difference between telling a story and just moving something in front of the audience's face.

And "it can't be done now, but it could be done in the future" is currently the fashionable way to say "we're developing this desirable thing, fund us!" (Or at least don't say things that will make the people who are funding us get cold feet!!) So I'm rather skeptical of your assertion that you're not arguing on behalf of AI.