[ SECRET POST #5989 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5989 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Friday Night Funkin]



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.
























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 18 secrets from Secret Submission Post #856.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Do you care this much about other, more widely known and accepted as "true", revisionist accounts of history?

Yes, I would say generally I do.

Maybe you do, but the "I care about historical accuracy" reasoning from most people sounds a lot like "Gamergate was about ethics in journalism" the way they frame it.

I mean you have to use your own judgment on that. But just to reiterate - my point is not that I care about historical accuracy in general; I don't. I'm fine with racebent and genderbent casting in most contexts. My point is that I generally don't like pseudohistorical revisionism, no matter who's doing it.

[(Anonymous)]

Tell me more about your opinions about the integrity of women’s sports.

[(Anonymous)]

Lol nice try derailing in lieu of actual arguments.