case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2023-06-16 06:21 pm

[ SECRET POST #6006 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6006 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.
[From]



__________________________________________________



06.
[Youtube channel "Hello Future Me"]



__________________________________________________



07.
[Monark]



__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________


















09. [SPOILERS for Across the Spiderverse]




__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for transphobia/standard JKR stuff]






















































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #858.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2023-06-18 11:57 pm (UTC)(link)
I've seen different numbers quoted as the correct amount of human sexes. But I have not seen these taken especially seriously by any scientific discipline aside from sociology.

"Those words are so mean!!" is a weak misdirection. Recognizing that women are the only people who can get pregnant and determining what all needs to happen so that they can keep control over their fertility (including taking steps to make it harder for men to rape women) has nothing to do with hurting the hypothetical feelings of infertile women. And plenty of women who are not risking pregnancy when they have sex care about avoiding situations where they could be raped for other reasons. This is why you run into resistance when trans activists propose that whether you have a penis or a uterus should make no difference in access to women's spaces. From women who are otherwise friendly to trans people.

It's narrow-minded of you to assume anyone who disagrees with you is choosing their political opinions out of a sense of self-interest. Regardless of how public policy changes, the chances of JK Rowling ever needing the services of a women-only rape crisis shelter are miniscule. When she funds one, and states that women should not be shamed out of asserting that gender-segregated facilities support their safety, she's looking out for other women.

(Anonymous) 2023-06-19 05:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Recognizing that women are the only people who can get pregnant

Untrue. There's been at least one man who has been pregnant. Granted, YOU don't think he's a man, but he does, and he presents himself as a man and fills that role in society. So what you think doesn't matter.

"Those words are so mean!!" is a weak misdirection.

It's not a misdirect at all. I was saying that not only are you wrong, you're also an asshole. Though research has come to conclude that being an asshole comes first, and then you build your worldview around it, so I don't have much hope for you. There was a recent article about how taking MDMA can make assholes realize that other people exist and have feelings though, so maybe give that a try?