case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2023-06-30 02:31 pm

[ SECRET POST #6020 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6020 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________
























07. [SPOILERS for Good Omens season 2]




__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for discussion of sexual misconduct allegations]




__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for discussion of sexual assault]

































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #860.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2023-07-01 03:16 am (UTC)(link)
"I don't see how the *methodology* of the protest is bad."

It's a bit short on actionable goals right now.

"Please include notes about what you're doing for diversity in your minutes" is an actionable goal - OTW can include a section on that in the minutes of all their big meetings, and everyone can agree that it has happened. Clear, and to the point.

But there's a lot of rhetoric in the movement that's just kinda vague, "Do better!" So... what kind of measuring-stick do we use for "better" exactly? When do we agree that this goal has been met and it's time to stop protesting? Who makes that call?

While I understand the desire to say, "Do better!" I'm more inclined to support a movement that has actionable goals.