[ SECRET POST #6020 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6020 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________
























07. [SPOILERS for Good Omens season 2]




__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for discussion of sexual misconduct allegations]




__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for discussion of sexual assault]

































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #860.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

It has to do with the fact that these EOTWR people got what they said they wanted. Yet they're still campaigning. For what? Let's ask them directly, shall we?

"Our concern is with racist fan works written for the purpose of making the fan site unwelcoming to fans of color."

Who gets to decide what the purpose of the fic is? Who gets to decide if that fic actually makes someone uncomfortable? And who gets to decide that the rest of us can't read it and make a decision for ourselves? They seem to think they do.


"We’re... asking ... for the OTW to implement common-sense measures to make the AO3 and the organization more inclusive."

Who gets to decide what "common-sense measures" are? Who gets to decide how the correct way of implementing them? They SAY that they want OTW to "ultimately determine", but OTW HAS ALREADY DONE THAT. It's their current anti-harassment policy where anyone can block anyone. So again, mission accomplished. So they're still campaigning for... what?

And here it is:

"this may result in creators receiving warnings about their works that are in violation of the new harassment policies. However, the end goal is not censorship,"

You can SAY the end goal is not censorship... but it's fucking censorship. It's the literal definition of censorship.

Censorship: the suppression or prohibition of any parts of books, films, news, etc. that are considered obscene, politically unacceptable, or a threat to security.


"creators receiving warnings about their works that are in violation of the new harassment policies" = "the suppression or prohibition of any parts...that are considered obscene, politically unacceptable"

OTW did commit publicly to act on racist shit. They've done so, they're still continuing to do so. They've been a bit busy with the CHILD PORN ATTACK ON THEIR VOLUNTEERS, so please excuse them if they don't have this as their foremost priority.

So why are people putting Stop OTW Racism (and SPECIFICALLY "OTW", not fandom racism, the organization specifically) on their fic AFTER the anti-harassment policies went active?

Because it was never about protecting fans of color. It was always about censorship. And they're not done yet.

[(Anonymous)]

Wow this is a very long way of saying “I didn’t know OTW actually committed to hiring an external consultant & is still working on that now in addition to the existing features”

Anyway it’s def just evil censorship & not literally asking the org to continue to update about an ongoing process the org itself is interested in carrying out & has been ongoing since 2020

[(Anonymous)]

I brought receipts. Put up or shut up.

[(Anonymous)]

Receipts of what? You literally just quoted their about page. What does that have to do with OTW’s statement on continuing to work on hiring a consultant? Are you just completely unaware of it?

[(Anonymous)]

nayrt

Check the links provided upthread.

[(Anonymous)]

That’s not what “receipts” means.

[(Anonymous)]

DA

In fandom, "receipts" can be used as a synonym for "proof." Kindly refrain from correcting people about things you don't know.

[(Anonymous)]

I know what it means, I’m saying you’re misusing the term, because you provided no proof. You just skimmed some sentences off of their about section. This isn’t providing screenshots of DMs that expose someone of wrongdoing, that’s the kind of thing that “providing the receipts” means. Not finding some easily available information that the group you’re against wants people to see. You can point out hypocrisy or double standards using information they give out and the things they say vs. the actions they take. But that’s not inherently having “receipts”. A much closer example to the definition is the anons upthread providing multiple links. You’ve done no such thing, just clipped some sentences from the about/FAQ section. Kindly refrain from assuming people don’t know things, and being patronizing, when you’re not using a phrase correctly. I was correcting you just like the anon above me did about receipts, and you just foolishly jumped to the conclusion that I didn’t know what it meant without any real reason to believe that.

Also, “receipts” to mean proof isn’t a “fandom” thing just because it’s used in fandom. It started in the mainstream over 10 years ago, and stemmed from an interview with Whitney Houston in 2002. Acting like it’s a fandom thing is much more “correcting people about things you don't know”, then me telling you that you aren’t using it correctly, which is true.

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

>you provided no proof

First of all, I'm not the person you(?) were arguing with above.

I commented because they made the point that the EOTWR campaign is lobbying for broad authority to get rid of fanfics they don't like, and backed it up with information that a lot of people have probably not gone and read. It's not a receipt because they had to break into someone's office to get it, but because instead of just expecting everyone to take their word for it, they quoted from the stated goals of the group and tailored their objections to that.

The definition of "receipts" you're putting forward seems questionably narrow.

>It started in the mainstream over 10 years ago [...]

Reciepts to mean proof certainly is a fandom thing. Whether it came from somewhere else, previously, makes little difference to this conversation.

[(Anonymous)]

DA

No, the AYRT is just addressing a different point than the one you keep trying to derail to. I'm skeptical that an organization that floundered ineffectually in the wake of its volunteers being threatened with doxxing or death-by-cop "needs" to prioritize hiring a diversity consultant. But more to the point, if you think the archive agreed to remove stories based on this group - or anyone else - criticising their availability, I want that notion soundly rejected by fandom now and never heard from again.

Note also that the story about omegaverse Nazis can perhaps be accused of anti-Semitism. From a group clamoring to save us from racism, that's mission creep. They're already acting like any variety of ickyness that offends them should go.