case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2023-07-23 03:49 pm

[ SECRET POST #6043 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6043 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.

























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 35 secrets from Secret Submission Post #864.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
meadowphoenix: (Default)

[personal profile] meadowphoenix 2023-07-24 08:13 am (UTC)(link)
hmm, i don't think i entirely agree. or rather I think this channel is for people who don't think about art very much, and if you think about art even slightly more, then it comes across as deceptive marketing.

like they are in fact giving you factoids, but its factoids you can find on the wikipedia page. (i also think you think there's more certainty in some art interpretation than there really are; they're not speculating, they could probably back everything up with research...that they found on the wikipedia page).

i guess i'm just thankful they don't use a robot voice to read the wikipedia page like other content farming channels.