Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2023-07-29 03:42 pm
[ SECRET POST #6049 ]
⌈ Secret Post #6049 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

[Formula One]
__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 38 secrets from Secret Submission Post #865.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
I personally think it's very telling that this so-called anti-capitalist, "anti-work" movement isn't calling for men to become trophy husbands and SAHF and and and. Also, "when financial need was not outright forcing them to earn a wage after they married"... straight-up financial need within a family unit is hardly the main reason women fought to be in the work force. They should always have independent income from their husband because economic dependence is dangerous and used against them in abusive situations, which are hardly diminishing. Besides that, in the current economy these young women CERTAINLY need to have disposable income, AND they sound woefully naive about the dangers of depending on the whims of their romantic partners. At the very least you get to put some distance between yourself and a traditional employer.
Also generally speaking I don't think putting these kinds of things together is a reach. There is a reactionary misogynist wave hitting worldwide at the moment (on top of the misogyny that never left), and these don't happen in a vacuum, IMO.