[ SECRET POST #6072 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6072 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.
[Jojo's Bizarre Adventure]



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.
[Futurama]



__________________________________________________



08.

























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 30 secrets from Secret Submission Post #868.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Vent thread

[(Anonymous)]

You may be right. I'm also puzzled by the suggestion that just because it might not do serious damage, it's a good idea. Um... no? Teaching kids that they don't have to let other people touch their bodies if that touch is unwanted is a very good idea. People should grow up believing that they don't need to endure physical contact with someone just because other people think they ought to do it.

And on the flip side, what exactly is the big benefit that makes forcing kids to hug and kiss people they don't want to hug and kiss? I have a hard time believing that this approach is going to yield a good sibling bond in OP's specific case. The whole "you don't know kids" is also baffling. Because kids are notorious for enthusiastically loving stuff that they've been forced to do by authority figures, right? And forced affection is a great way to develop real affection, of course!