Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2023-09-19 06:40 pm
[ SECRET POST #6101 ]
⌈ Secret Post #6101 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

[Symphony of War]
__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

[Doctor Who]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 12 secrets from Secret Submission Post #872.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Getting food to go
(Anonymous) 2023-09-20 02:36 am (UTC)(link)If you're not supposed to get it to go, are you supposed to force yourself to eat it all? Or just leave it there? How is wasting food "more professional" than not/how does it make you more equal to your boss?
It's just honestly never crossed my mind that you *wouldn't* get it to go if there's more than a couple bites left/it's something you like and would be good reheated. I'm just so baffled about why it would be inappropriate. Can anyone explain, please?
Re: Getting food to go
(Anonymous) 2023-09-20 02:58 am (UTC)(link)That's why people were saying to only do it if the boss does it.
Re: Getting food to go
(Anonymous) 2023-09-20 03:21 am (UTC)(link)Re: Getting food to go
(Anonymous) 2023-09-20 03:27 am (UTC)(link)Re: Getting food to go
(Anonymous) 2023-09-20 03:32 am (UTC)(link)Yeah. It's such a bizarre take that it didn't even occur to me. I can't imagine even rich people being bothered about that.
Re: Getting food to go
(Anonymous) 2023-09-20 03:41 am (UTC)(link)Discrimination based on perceived wealth and social class is very much a thing, even if you're (somehow) in a place where people don't do it.
Re: Getting food to go
(Anonymous) 2023-09-20 03:53 am (UTC)(link)Congrats on the privilege.
Re: Getting food to go
(Anonymous) 2023-09-20 03:55 am (UTC)(link)Re: Getting food to go
(Anonymous) 2023-09-20 06:51 am (UTC)(link)Re: Getting food to go
(Anonymous) 2023-09-20 03:18 pm (UTC)(link)People discriminate people outside of their perceived socioeconomic group, yes. This disadvantages people in certain groups more than others, yes. But the take that taking a doggy bag from the restaurant because the portion is too big to eat in one sitting will make your boss think you are poor AND keep them from promoting you because of said poorness is a lot.
Re: Getting food to go
(Anonymous) 2023-09-20 04:50 pm (UTC)(link)That kind of subtle discrimination happens a lot.
Re: Getting food to go
(Anonymous) 2023-09-20 10:46 pm (UTC)(link)Commenters are saying, what if the boss is some rich guy who'll think OP is poor because they took their leftovers home and then not promote OP because of discrimination.
Unless OP's boss is Elon Musk, it's far more likely that boss is a regular person who also frequents regular restaurants and has most likely taken home a doggy bag or two themselves during their lifetime. Especially since they're going to a restaurant that's affordable enough that OP has been there multiple times before and that serves big enough portions to even need the doggy bag in the first place. Swanky restaurants that are frequented by rich people don't serve such huge portions.
If you really want to make sure you're not perceived as poor in this situation, you can throw in a line about how much you like this place, but the portions are just always too big - making it clear you eat here often, i. e. not poor since you have enough money to eat out. Problem solved and OP can still take their doggy bag home.
Re: Getting food to go
(Anonymous) 2023-09-21 04:38 am (UTC)(link)100% this. I've been to Michelin-starred restaurants for work lunches before and guess what? They serve small portions that don't leave you enough left over to take home.
Re: Getting food to go
(Anonymous) 2023-09-20 09:57 pm (UTC)(link)Asking to take home leftovers in a "doggy bag" can be considered an act of "poor" people. A wealthier person can afford to waste what is left and let it be thrown away. People assume you don't have enough money if you might take home your leftover food and they may not hire you.
Re: Getting food to go
(Anonymous) 2023-09-21 12:42 am (UTC)(link)Also, if it's your boss, them not hiring you is not really a concern.
Re: Getting food to go
(Anonymous) 2023-09-20 09:57 pm (UTC)(link)Well, I wrote the comment above w/o fully reading what you wrote! My bad.
Re: Getting food to go
(Anonymous) 2023-09-20 09:02 am (UTC)(link)Don't miss that job. Used to get groped a lot. Bleurgh.
Re: Getting food to go
(Anonymous) 2023-09-20 10:44 am (UTC)(link)Re: Getting food to go
(Anonymous) 2023-09-20 01:47 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Getting food to go
(Anonymous) 2023-09-20 02:52 pm (UTC)(link)That's the thing, if context matters then context matters and the *way* in which you take things home would also impact the results. "Oh this is so good but I can't finish it, I'm going to take this to enjoy it later, thanks so much for introducing me to this restaurant (implying you'd visit again on your own)" is markedly different from "I need a doggy bag pls, I'm going to have these leftovers for dinner" even if your boss is a classist asshole and nobody is acknowledging that *how* you do this matters.
Rich people take things home all the time too.
Re: Getting food to go
(Anonymous) 2023-09-20 04:49 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Getting food to go
(Anonymous) 2023-09-20 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Getting food to go
(Anonymous) 2023-09-20 03:04 am (UTC)(link)A similar question came up on askamanager.org recently and Alison also said it's fine. I'd trust AAM on questions about professional conduct any day over fandom secrets.