Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2023-12-14 08:49 pm
[ SECRET POST #6187 ]
⌈ Secret Post #6187 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

[Baldur's Gate 3]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 09 secrets from Secret Submission Post #884.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-12-15 03:28 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-12-15 03:35 am (UTC)(link)I don't see why that would be true. A bunch of the audience tuned back in to check out Chibnall's Who after Moffat left. And then they left pretty quickly, because Chibnall's Who was crap (due to the poor writing specifically, no hate to the performers). But I see no reason why they wouldn't be willing to check back in again? I don't see what Chibnall did that so uniquely, totally alienated the entire potential viewing audience. There's a lot of people who basically like Doctor Who and are interested in watching it when it's good.
It was this or cancellation, and this only came about by chance.
Do you have specific evidence for this?
no subject
Me for example. I generally did like what RTD did before, so I came into the current situation cautiously optimistic rather than having no thoughts one way or the other, but if it had been someone I hadn't heard of before that'd be fine and I'd still have come back for a while to see if they were any good. (If it somehow had been Steven Moffat, lol... well, that still would probably have been okay because I was okay with his previous material too, flaws and all. But "cautiously optimistic" might have been downgraded a bit to "really? well, I'll give him a chance, anyway".)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2023-12-15 09:34 am (UTC)(link)