case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2024-02-11 06:48 am

[ SECRET POST #6245 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6245 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.
[20,000 leagues]



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.
[Scarlet Nexus]



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of Israel/Palestine conflict, genocide, etc]

































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #892.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2024-02-14 06:52 pm (UTC)(link)
You're advising OP based off of the assumption that what they don't want (politics) is actually what the space is for. The opposite assumption, that what OP wants (politics-free fandom space) is actually what the space is for, would lead to different advice.
meadowphoenix: (Default)

[personal profile] meadowphoenix 2024-02-14 08:03 pm (UTC)(link)
No, that's the assumption you made about what i'm saying. i'm talking about how a space defines itself, and that is by the type of regulation of its members. if the space op is in has no mechanism to stop certain subjects, whatever they are, by definition those subjects are allowed and the space's purpose isn't for disallowing them. it could annoy many many people! but as long as another person can do something that annoys you, the space is the type of space that allows that annoyance.