case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2024-02-12 07:38 am

[ SECRET POST #6246 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6246 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.
































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 40 secrets from Secret Submission Post #893.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2024-02-12 12:08 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I feel that. It's always disappointing to read smut that's kind of paint-by-numbers, where you know the writer wasn't getting into the characters' heads and really feeling it (and by that, I don't mean to suggest that a writer needs to, like, actually get turned on or anything, but that it should at least come across that they spent some time imagining how the characters feel about one another, about the act itself, etc).

I've been thinking lately if that might be why so much romance in original fiction falls flat. The writer has a plan that involves two characters getting together, but they're detached from it in a way that makes it less believable.